Making the Right Choice for Your Business
Choosing between a PR agency and building an in-house team is one of the most important decisions you'll make for your communications strategy. Both options have distinct advantages, and the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and growth trajectory.
This guide breaks down the real costs, capabilities, and trade-offs to help you make an informed decision. We'll cover everything from salary comparisons to crisis response capabilities, so you can confidently choose the path that aligns with your business goals.
Cost Comparison: The Real Numbers
Breaking down the true costs of each option
In-House PR Team
A full in-house team (Manager + Specialist + Coordinator) costs $180,000-$350,000 annually when you factor in salaries, benefits, tools, training, and overhead. Plus, you're locked in regardless of workload.
PR Agency Partnership
Agency retainers typically range from $5,000-$15,000/month ($60,000-$180,000/year) and include an entire team of specialists, media databases, and established relationships. Scale up or down as needed.
Expertise & Specialization
In-house teams develop deep knowledge of your brand and industry, but their expertise is limited to a few individuals. Agency teams bring diverse specialists—media relations experts, crisis managers, content strategists—who've worked across multiple industries and faced every scenario.
The question isn't just about what you know—it's about who you know. Agencies have spent years cultivating relationships with journalists, editors, and producers. These connections often take 5-10 years to build, and they're the difference between a pitch that gets ignored and one that lands a feature story.
Scalability & Flexibility
How each option handles growth and change
Instant Scale
Agencies can ramp up resources for product launches or crisis situations within days, not months.
No Hiring Hassle
Skip the 3-6 month recruiting process. Agencies provide immediate access to specialized talent.
Flexible Commitment
Month-to-month flexibility vs. annual salary obligations. Adjust as your needs change.
When to Choose Each Option
Choose an agency when you need broad media relationships, crisis capabilities, or specialized expertise across multiple areas. Agencies excel when you're launching products, entering new markets, or need to scale quickly.
Choose in-house when you have consistent, high-volume work that requires someone embedded in your daily operations. Large enterprises with dedicated budgets and ongoing media programs often benefit from a hybrid approach.
Most growing companies find agencies offer better ROI until they reach $50M+ in revenue and can justify a fully-staffed internal communications department.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does a PR agency cost compared to in-house?
PR agencies typically cost $60,000-$180,000/year, while a full in-house team runs $180,000-$350,000+ when you include salaries, benefits, tools, and training. Agencies often deliver better ROI for growing companies.
Can I use both an agency and in-house team?
Yes! Many companies use a hybrid model—a small internal team handles day-to-day communications while an agency provides specialized expertise, media relationships, and surge capacity for big initiatives.
How quickly can an agency start delivering results?
Agencies with established media relationships can begin pitching immediately. You'll typically see initial coverage within 30-60 days, compared to 6-12 months to build an in-house team from scratch.
What if I need crisis PR support?
Agencies provide 24/7 crisis response with experienced teams who've handled similar situations. In-house teams may lack this depth of experience and after-hours availability.
How do I evaluate if an agency is right for me?
Look at their media relationships in your industry, case studies with measurable results, response time during the sales process, and whether they ask insightful questions about your business goals.
Boost your productivity today
Tell us about your project and get a free quote from our team.